Creationist Cosmology: Starlight, Time, and the New Physics
September 5, 2009
Recently I’ve been reading a book entitled Starlight, Time, and the New Physics, which was published in 2007 by Dr. John Hartnett, a professor from the University of West Australia. He has earned a Ph.D. in Physics, and he has published over 120 papers in scientific journals and holds two patents. Shockingly, Hartnett is also a young-earth creationist. The way Darwinists talk, Christians and physicists could never play nice, especially when it came to cosmology and the origin of the universe. What’s funny is that Hartnett has a scientific problem with the Big Bang Theory. Well, actually he has several.
Continue reading at our new wordpress blog
Entry Filed under: science. Tags: agnosticism, Apologetics, atheism, background radiation, Bible, carmelli, christianity, cosmological relativity, dark energy, dark matter, hartnett, quasars, science, Worldview.
3 Comments Add your own
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed
1.
Ray Miles | October 31, 2009 at 2:24 am
i finally did find one critisicm of hartnett’s equations … “Comment on ‘The Cosmic Time in Terms of the Redshift’ ” by Alan Macdonald, Luther College, Feb 7, 2008 (easily found using google) … but his criticism melts to nothing because 1/Ho (the inverse of Hubble’s constant) does in fact compute to approx 14Gyr (13.8Gyr) … so the only mathematician that i have been able to find who critiques Carmeli and Hartnett on their math turns out to be touting the LCDM cosmology and their equations which include dark matter … someone needs to tell Macdonald that t(0) = tau = 1/Ho = 13.8Gyr, and that he may now freely investigate the remainder of Carmeli and Hartnett’s conclusions rather than insist on promulgating the lamda cold dark matter equations
2.
Ray Miles | October 31, 2009 at 2:33 am
btw, did u know that Einstein thanked Hubble for finding what is now called Hubble’s Constant, because then Einstein could abandon trying to do what then became unecessary further work on his cosmological constant … yet cosmologists still toy with a cosmological constant in relation to dark matter and dark energy … thank goodness for Moshe Carmeli who took Einstein and Hubble’s work to the next level, and for John Hartnett who is helping us correlate this work with the Genesis account
3.
Ray Miles | October 31, 2009 at 2:34 am
oh yeah…and Carmeli’s assumptions and equations predicted Hubble’s results before he found them … if i am correct, two years before he found them … sweet !